Legal Opinion

Concrete Placing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 19, 1992No. 26-89CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This case involves a government contractor’s claim for an equitable adjustment to a contract with the National Guard Bureau, a joint bureau of the Departments of the Army and the Air Force. The contract was for maintenance and repair of an existing concrete aircraft parking apron at Gowen Field in Boise, Idaho. Plaintiff, Concrete Placing Co., Inc. (Concrete Placing), has performed the contract and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 and 41 U.S.C. § 605 (Supp. 1991), appeals from the contracting officer’s (CO) final decision denying its request for relief. Defendant has…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Servidone Construction Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Cavalier Clothes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Ryco Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Big Chief Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API