Legal Opinion
WRB Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 19, 1968No. 67-62PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
During 1958-1960 the plaintiff — 17 California corporations acting together as a joint venture under the name Eobertson Construction Company — built a 500-unit Cape-hart Act housing project at Fort Hood, Texas. Having collected the original contract price of $8,218,036 plus about $16,000 resulting from 10 formal changes in the contract, the joint venture now seeks almost one and one-half million dollars for alleged breaches by the Government during construction.
This complex case was referred to Trial Commissioner Mastín G. White with directions to make findings of fact and to recommend…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Metric Constructors, Inc. v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Servidone Construction Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.