Legal Opinion
Big Chief Drilling Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 25, 1992No. 118-86CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
The plaintiff, Big Chief Drilling Company (Big Chief), brought this action under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1988). The jurisdiction of this court is uncontested under 41 U.S.C. § 609 (1988).
Prior to filing its complaint in the United States Claims Court, on December 4, 1983, Big Chief filed a claim with the Department of Energy (DOE) requesting reimbursement in the amount of $906,525.93. The claim to DOE related only to well number 108A and requested reimbursement for expenses incurred as a result of the loss of the casing shoe and for expenses…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neal & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Kiewit Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Ehlers-Noll, GMBH v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Spectrum Sciences & Software, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- M.A. Mortenson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998