Legal Opinion
G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 31, 1984No. 386-79CPublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
In this construction contract case, plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of itself and on behalf of Continental Drilling Company (Continental), its subcontractor, from defendant arising out of its construction of the Nambe Palls Dam in New Mexico for the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior (BOR). Plaintiff filed its petition (complaint) in this court as a direct access ease under section 10(a)(1), (3) of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, codified at 41 U.S.C. § 609 (1982). Plaintiff advances five separate theories of recovery in claiming some $4…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Melvin Wilner, D/B/A Wilner Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.