Legal Opinion
Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 10, 1987No. 87-1304PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Claims Court rejecting the appellant’s claim for an equitable adjustment of its contract price based upon two claims: that the site conditions it found in performing the contract were different from those stated in the specifications, and that the specifications were defective. The Claims Court rejected both contentions. Stuyvesant Dredging Co. v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 853 (1987). We affirm.
I
A. The principal facts in this case, as found by the Claims Court, are not in dispute. On June 24, 1982, the United States…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- John G. Vann and Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- H.B. Mac, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Blake Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.