Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Application of Philip M. Carabateas

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7266PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 2 in patent application serial No. 860,368, filed December 18, 1959, for “Compositions and their Preparation.” Product claim 7 has been allowed.

Appellant’s invention, in its composition aspect, which is all we are concerned with in this appeal, is described in the specification as “residing in the concept of a composition having a molecular structure in which a lower-acyloxy substituent is attached to the remaining 4-position of 4-aryl-l-[omega-aromatic-omega-oxo-(lower -…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of William C. WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Application of Nathaniel GrierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  5. Application of John C. NygardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. In re GyurikCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. Application of Philip M. CarabateasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API