Legal Opinion

Application of Carl D. Lunsford

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 17, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7478PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*381HIGH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 4 and 5 in application serial No. 821,358, filed June 19, 1959, for “Halo-Substi-' tuted Phenoxymethyl Oxazolidones.” No claim is allowed.

The sole issue is obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of the following references :

Beasley et al., Chem. Abstracts, Vol. 51, col. 8723 (1957)1

Karrer, “Organic Chemistry” (Else-vier), pp. 434, 445 (1950)

Noller, “Chem. of Organic Compounds,” 2nd Ed., (Saunders), pp. 440-1 (1957)

Fieser et al., “Organic Chemistry,” (Reinhold),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Schering Corporation v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Application of John R. StemniskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. In Re John P. ChuppCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. In re MercierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API