Legal Opinion

In re Gyurik

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 12, 1979No. Appeal No. 78-615PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) sustaining the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1 — 5 and 15 — 16 of application serial No. 557,207, filed March 10, 1975, for “New Anthelmintic 5-Cycloal-kylthio- and Oxy-2-Carbalkoxyaminoben-zimidazole Compositions.” 1 We reverse.

The Invention

The invention is directed to 5-cycloalkyl-thio— and oxy — benzimidazole compounds having general anthelmintic properties, /. e., broad spectrum activity against parasitic worms of warm-blooded animals. The compounds are disclosed as…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  4. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. Application of John R. StemniskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. In Re Godfrey Newbold HounsfieldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. In re FracalossiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. In Re Jean Pierre Lalu and Louis FoulletierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API