Legal Opinion

Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. Spurlin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 16, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6968PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 to 10, the only claims of appellants’ patent application, 1 as unpatentable over a single prior art patent.

The invention relates to organic thiophosphate compounds having the «general formula

in which R represents a' lower alkyl radical.

The compounds have pesticidal properties and are said to distinguish over known pesticidal compounds in being more toxic at low concentrations toward certain pests and in having exceptionally good systemic toxicity.

The claims…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of HenzeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Application of Victor MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. Application of SchechterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Application of Habet M. KhelghatianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. Application of Minoo Dossabhoy MehtaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API