Legal Opinion
Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred Bänder
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 22, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7254PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-6 and 8-13 of application serial No. 601,-107, filed July 31, 1956, for a patent on “New Benzene Sulfonyl Ureas and Process for their Preparation.” All appealed claims are directed to compounds. The appeal from the examiner to the board was on claims 1-13 but in his answer before the board the examiner said, “upon reconsideration claim 7 is deemed allowable.”
The board’s opinion recites the fact that there were other claims, 17 and 19-25, referred to as the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In Re ThuauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of John P. LambooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In re ArkleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.