Legal Opinion

Application of Carl D. Lunsford

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 17, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7478Published

1Opinion of the Court

357 F.2d 380

Application of Carl D. LUNSFORD.

Patent Appeal No. 7478.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 17, 1966.

Gordon W. Hueschen, Kalamazoo, Mich., for appellant.

Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (Fred W. Sherling, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges.

RICH, Judge.

1

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner's rejection of claims 4 and 5 in application serial No. 821,358, filed June 19, 1959, for "Halo-Substituted Phenoxymethyl…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Schering Corporation v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API