Legal Opinion

Application of Rudolf Wiechert

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 19, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7636PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3 of application serial No. 98,026, filed March 24, 1961, for “la-Methyl Steroids.” Claims 11-18 and 25 have been allowed.

Introduction

The invention relates to certain la-methyl dihydrotestosterones and their 17-acylates which possess strong androgenic and anabolic activities. Claim 1, *929generic to all claims in the application, reads:

1. A compound of the formula:

wherein X is selected from the group consisting of hydrgen and halogen; wherein

and wherein R is selected…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. In Re Bose CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. In Re Francis J.A.M.C. De Blauwe and Frank K.A. SelleslagsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. In Re Jack G. MakariCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Richard Walter Ricker and Oswald Bryan Salyer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API