Legal Opinion
Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 2001No. C9-00-1247PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
On appeal, Lone Oak Sportsmen’s Club, Inc. alleges that (1) the trial court should not have enjoined certain uses of the club because respondents failed to show damages, nuisance or trespass, or a violation of the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA); (2) the claims for nuisance, trespass, and MERA violations are barred by the statute of limitations or on the grounds that appellant established a prescriptive easement; (3) the trial court abused its discretion by excluding expert testimony; and (4) the trial court’s findings regarding the danger posed by appellant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wendinger v. Forst Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Ebert v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Shaw v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.