Ebert v. General Mills, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant General Mills, Inc.’s (“GMI” or *1226“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (Doc. No. 97.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Karl Ebert (“Ebert”), Carol Krauze (“Krauze”), and Jackie Milbrandt (“Milbrandt”), individually and on behalf of others similarly situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), allege that GMI owned and operated an industrial facility (the “GMI Facility”) in the Como neighborhood of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson Road Development Corp. v. Fronabarger Concreters, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016
- Clancy v. Vacationaire Estates, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Clean Water and Air Legacy, LLC v. Tofte Wastewater Treatment AssociationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Melton Properties, LLC v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020