Legal Opinion

Ebert v. General Mills, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 4, 2014No. Civil No. 13-3341 (DWF/JJK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant General Mills, Inc.’s (“GMI” or *1226“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (Doc. No. 97.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Karl Ebert (“Ebert”), Carol Krauze (“Krauze”), and Jackie Milbrandt (“Milbrandt”), individually and on behalf of others similarly situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), allege that GMI owned and operated an industrial facility (the “GMI Facility”) in the Como neighborhood of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson Road Development Corp. v. Fronabarger Concreters, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016
  2. Clancy v. Vacationaire Estates, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  3. Clean Water and Air Legacy, LLC v. Tofte Wastewater Treatment AssociationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
  4. Melton Properties, LLC v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API