Wiard Memorial Park District v. Wiard Community Pool, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The trial court granted plaintiff’s petition to condemn defendant’s property. On appeal, defendant argues that plaintiff abused its discretion when it determined that taking defendant’s property was most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. We affirm.
Plaintiff is the Wiard Memorial Park District, which is located in Klamath Falls. It is a public entity responsible for maintaining several acres of parks in the area, the largest of which is Wiard Park. Defendant is the Wiard Community Pool, Inc., which owns a parcel of land next to Wiard Park. Defendant is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Dockins v. State Farm InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Checkley v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Employment Department v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Employment Department v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue v. Amerco Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021