Legal Opinion

Stull v. Hoke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1997No. CC 940503716; CA A86270; SC S43523PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKulongoski, J.

The primary issue in this case is when a civil action is deemed commenced, for purposes of the statute of limitations, when the plaintiff who files the complaint is an indigent person who is incarcerated in a prison facility. For the reasons explained below, we hold that, in these circumstances, the action commences when the complaint is received by the court.

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Columbia River Correctional Institution, delivered a complaint to the prison law librarian on April 11,1994, with the intent that it be mailed to the Multnomah County Circuit Court for filing. The handwritten…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Highway Commission v. Fisch-Or, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API