Legal Opinion

Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. Foster

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1959PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

These are two appeals by the defendant, consolidated through stipulation of the parties, from two judgments rendered by the circuit court in favor of the plaintiff in condemnation actions. The actions were instituted pursuant to ORS 376.505 through 376.540, and the only difference between them is the identity of the real property they affect. Each of the two challenged judgments appropriated to the plaintiff an easement, 80 feet wide, over land owned by the defendant, for the right of way for a logging road which the plaintiff wishes to construct. The two roads, if built, will start at the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Crane v. HahloSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. Cornelison v. SeaboldOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. CurranOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. M. K. F. v. MiramontesOregon Supreme Court · 2012

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API