Checkley v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
In this appeal, plaintiff challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on plaintiffs claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), wrongful use of a civil proceeding, and vicarious liability of the Keizer Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (the “Congregation”) for the acts of defendants Charles and Bimla Boyd (the Boyds). We conclude that the trial court correctly granted summary judgment on the wrongful use and vicarious liability claims, but erred in granting summary judgment on plaintiff s IIED claim. We also conclude that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schoen v. FREIGHTLINER LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Eads v. BormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Taylor v. Ramsay-Gerding Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Columbia Cascade Co. v. City of Fernandina BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.