Legal Opinion

Dockins v. State Farm Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1999No. CC 9605-03556; CA A98608; SC S45747PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

As this insurance coverage dispute comes to this court, the sole issue concerns plaintiffs’ right to collect attorney fees from defendant insurer. Before trial, the parties settled the substance of the action in plaintiffs’ favor for $15,000. The parties left open the question of attorney fees to be resolved by the trial court if and when plaintiffs petitioned the court for such fees. After the parties had entered into a stipulated judgment reflecting their agreement, plaintiffs petitioned for attorney fees. Defendant objected. The trial court concluded that plaintiffs were not entitled to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Heis v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ClaypoolOregon Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Precision Seed Cleaners v. Country Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  3. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Weatherspoon v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Zimmerman v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API