Legal Opinion
Employment Department v. Clark
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 1, 2003No. 01-AB-2093, A117262PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*433EDMONDS, P. J.
The Employment Department (department) seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (board). The department asserts that the board incorrectly interpreted ORS 657.310. We agree and reverse.
Claimant Anthony Clark filed a claim for unemployment benefits in December 2000 and was awarded a weekly benefit of $376. While collecting benefits, claimant began working part time for Office Depot. On several occasions, claimant under reported to the department the amount of money that he earned weekly while working at Office Depot.1 The department eventually discovered the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Holman Transfer Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Layman v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Roy L. Houck & Sons v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vavrosky Maccoll Olson Busch & Pfeifer PC v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Employment Department v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003