Legal Opinion

Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1980No. WCB 77-657, CA 14540, SC 26685PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The issues presented in this case involve the presumption created for the benefit of firefighters in Oregon’s occupational disease law, ORS 656.802.

We allowed review to consider the following questions:(1) What is the procedural effect of the firefighters’ presumption in ORS 656.802?(2) Does the holding in Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27, 602 P2d 259 (1979) apply to a firefighter entitled to the presumption in ORS 656.802?

ORS 656.802 states in relevant part:

"(1) As used in ORS 656.802 to 656.824, 'occupational disease’ means:

« # ¡fa # ífc Hí

"(b) Death, disability or impairment of health of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cook v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. StillingOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark JessupCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Lindquist v. City of Jersey City Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Aetna Casualty Co. v. AschbacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Cunningham v. City of Manchester Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Saif Corp. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API