Legal Opinion

Diaz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1987No. 3-86-162-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Robert Diaz appeals his conviction by a jury for murder, Tex.Pen.Code Ann. § 19.02 (1974), and the jury’s assessment of punishment at 60 years imprisonment and a fine of $5,000.' For the reasons to be discussed herein, we will reform the judgment of conviction to delete the affirmative find ing that appellant used or exhibited a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense and, as reformed, affirm the judgment of conviction as to guilt. However, we will remand the cause to the trial court for a new trial as to punishment.

In his first point of error, appellant complains that the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Chavez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Herring v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  3. Harding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API