Diaz v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
Robert Diaz appeals his conviction by a jury for murder, Tex.Pen.Code Ann. § 19.02 (1974), and the jury’s assessment of punishment at 60 years imprisonment and a fine of $5,000.' For the reasons to be discussed herein, we will reform the judgment of conviction to delete the affirmative find ing that appellant used or exhibited a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense and, as reformed, affirm the judgment of conviction as to guilt. However, we will remand the cause to the trial court for a new trial as to punishment.
In his first point of error, appellant complains that the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Chavez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Herring v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Harding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.