Mitchell v. City of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for injury to real property from the diversion of waters from a natural stream, defendant city of Santa Barbara appeals.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff (respondent), the essential facts are:
Plaintiffs are the owners of a store building and furniture business located on the comer of Milpas and East Ortega Streets in the city of Santa Barbara. Since man’s memory runneth not to the contrary there has existed within the corporate city a series of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Conniff v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Spangler v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Gomez v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Sturges v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Noble v. Kertz & Sons Feed & Fuel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.