Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1936No. L. A. 14610PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

A hearing was granted in this case, after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One, in order that it might be considered and determined together with Inyo Chemical Co. v. City of Los Angeles, L. A. No. 14916 (ante, p. 525 [55 Pac. (2d) 850]), this day decided. Both cases arise out of the same general event, the break in the Olancha division of the Los Angeles aqueduct on November 26, 1926. Both plaintiffs sought to recover damages alleged to have been proximately caused by the negligence of defendant city in the construction and maintenance of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Inyo Chemical Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API