Legal Opinion
Myers v. Stephens
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1965No. Civ. 21910PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
Defendants Lee Stephens and Ferrol Development Company appeal from a judgment, after a court trial, awarding plaintiff damages in the sum of $3,040. The case was tried, and judgment was entered, upon a conversion theory based on the sale by defendants of personal property which they had allegedly previously sold to plaintiff.
Questions Presented
1. Did plaintiff and defendants enter into a valid and enforceable contract of sale on November 14, 1962, so as to give plaintiff a cause of action in conversion against de fendants who “resold” the same property to a third person on November 15, 1962?
2.…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Republic of Nicaragua, a Foreign Sovereign v. Standard Fruit Company, Standard Fruit and Steamship Company, and Castle & Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Schmitz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Krueger v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.