Legal Opinion

Omega Investment Co. v. Woolley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1928No. 4509PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought to recover 465,701 shares of the capital stock of the Nathaniel Baldwin Incorporated, a corporation hereafter referred to as the Incorporated. The respondents claim that the stock in question belonged to the plaintiff, Omega Investment Company, and that it was transferred to the other defendants by the defendant, the Incorporated, by virtue of fraudulent practices and undue influence exercised by said defendants upon Nathaniel Baldwin, who was the principal stockholder of the plaintiff corporation and of the Incorporated.

It is admitted by the defendants that the stock…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dale v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  4. Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Stone v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ashton v. SkeenUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Holland v. MoretonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Jardine v. ArchibaldUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API