Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Leeper

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1913No. 2783PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by J. G. Leeper, as executor of Thomas J. Bailey deceased, against Daniel W. Hogan and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

This was an action by Thomas J. Bailey, now deceased, against Daniel W. Hogan, Samuel E. Bailey, Dora L. Adams, Mamie L. Huntley, John A. Bailey,. Thomas A. Bailey, and Leigh M. Bailey. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

The plaintiff has died since the trial, and the case has been revived by malting J. G. Leeper, executor of his will, the defendant in error here. The plaintiff, Thomas J. Bailey,, had been married a number of years ago, and the defendants, named, except Hogan, are his children by the wife of his youth. These children grew up and his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Bethany Hospital Co. v. PhilippiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Wat-Tah-Noh-Zhe v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Probst v. BearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Black v. DonelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API