Legal Opinion

Cadman v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 6, 1905PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error from the District Court of Nolle County; before Bayard T. Rainer, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by

Gillette, J.:

This action was brought by the defendant in error,* W. T. Smith, to remove a cloud upon his title to lot 10, block 37, in the city of Perry, Noble county, O. T.

The petition charges that the plaintiff in error, Netta B. Cadman, is the holder of a tax deed to said lot, issued and recorded on November 31, 1901, based upon a tax sale certificate issued November 30, 1899', for taxes due on said lot for the year 1897 and 1898, the action being brought June 3, 1903. A trial was had and concluded in the district court of Noble county in December, 1903, at the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Early v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette Railroad v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Bacon v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Frazier v. PrinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lind v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Welborn v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Swan v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API