Legal Opinion

Stone v. Moody

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1906No. 5943PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered July 27, 1905, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial before the court without a jury, dismissing on the merits an action to rescind a contract for the sale of land.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

Appellants owned about three thousand eight hundred and forty acres of land, ini Klickitat county, upon which they lived. Respondent H. L. Moody, who up to the time in question had been unknown to the appellants, called upon them with reference to making a purchase of said land. After examining the land, and spending two or three days with them, a written contract was entered into, wherein and whereby Moody agreed to pay appellants $25,000 for the land, and in lieu of interest, agreed to pay $600 additional. The terms of the payment were as follows: $100 cash, $400 February 1904, $1,000 March…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Welch v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kelley v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API