Williams v. Vail
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Cass Circuit. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.:
_ Vail recovered a judgment below, against Williams, as principal, and Beckwith and Kingsbury, as sureties on a replevin bond — Williams having become nonsuit in the original replevin suit, and Vail having recovered a judgment for the value of the property with the costs of his defense.
*163The errors assigned cover two points: Mrst, the ruling of the court below, whereby the right of action was maintained on the return of the execution referred to in th,e record: Second, the refusal of the court to permit evidence to show that Yail was but a part-owner of the property replevied, for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dorr v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wright v. HakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- People ex rel. Clinton v. LaninsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Pearl v. GarlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Henry v. QuackenbushMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Lindner v. BrockMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.