Legal Opinion

Williams v. Vail

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1861PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Cass Circuit. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

_ Vail recovered a judgment below, against Williams, as principal, and Beckwith and Kingsbury, as sureties on a replevin bond — Williams having become nonsuit in the original replevin suit, and Vail having recovered a judgment for the value of the property with the costs of his defense.

*163The errors assigned cover two points: Mrst, the ruling of the court below, whereby the right of action was maintained on the return of the execution referred to in th,e record: Second, the refusal of the court to permit evidence to show that Yail was but a part-owner of the property replevied, for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dorr v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wright v. HakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. People ex rel. Clinton v. LaninsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pearl v. GarlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Henry v. QuackenbushMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Lindner v. BrockMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API