Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Clinton v. Lanins
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Case. Defendants bring error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
On April 29, 1884, Benjamin H. Laning and Isaiab O. Laning, wbo were botel-keepers in *285Fenton, Genesee county, desiring to obtain the right to engage in the business of retail liquor dealers, presented to the common council of the village of Fenton their bond for approval, with Burdick Potter and D. F. Rice as sureties. This bond was approved by the common council of the village on May 9, 1884, and, with the justification of the sureties attached thereto, reads as follows:
“ Know all men by these presents, that we, Benjamin H. Laning and Isaiah O. Laning, of Fenton, as principals, and Burdick…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Village of Port Jervis v. . First National B'k.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Barney v. DeweyNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Stoddard v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- P R Post Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Brockway v. PettedMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- People ex rel. Bennett v. BenfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- People ex rel. Clinton v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.