Legal Opinion

Dorr v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1859PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit. The case is sufficiently stated in tbe opinion:

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

Clark having sued out an attachment against Philo Durfee and Samuel T. Atwater, as absent defendants, the sheriff of Saginaw levied upon a vessel called the Armada, and Dorr and the other plaintiffs in error, gave bond under the statute, in the usual form, to release it from the levy by undertaking to produce the property to satisfy any execution that should be issued on any judgment in the attachment suit. Durfee and Atwater appeared, and pleaded, and judgment went against them. The sheriff assigned the bond to Clark, the property not being forthcoming, and the latter brought…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Tax Commission of Utah v. KatsisUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Williams v. VailMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Wolf v. HahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Case, Bishop & Co. v. D. M. Steele & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Cermak v. SchaafIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API