Legal Opinion

Lindner v. Brock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Bay. Assumpsit on replevin bond. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

One Hogan brought replevin to recover from Brock the possession of certain personal property, appraised at something over $3,000. The property was taken on the writ, and delivered to Hogan on his executing and delivering to the officer the statutory replevin bond, in which Lindner, the plaintiff in error, was one of the sureties. Brock was at that time the sheriff of Bay county, and the writ of replevin was executed by the coroner. The sureties in the replevin bond were *620excepted to, and failed to justify, and Hogan offered no other bond. This under the statute entitled Brock to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorr v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Williams v. VailMichigan Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. AkeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Jim Causley Pontiac Inc. v. World Wide Auto Leasing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Flint v. TraheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API