Pearl v. Garlock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton. (Smith, J.) Action on replevin bond. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion and summarized in head-note 1.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Pearl, as assignee of Henry Stark, sued defendants on a replevin bond given to Stark, as defendant, in a suit brought by Eldorus Garlock for a horse. The suit hav*421ingbeen discontinued, Stark took judgment for a return, and issued an execution, which was returned unsatisfied. ' Stark assigned all his interest to Pearl.
Upon the trial of the suit upon the bond, defendants, by way of defense, offered to show that Eldorus Garlock, the principal defendant, was the owner of the horse. The court refused to admit this testimony, and held that the title to the horse was settled in the replevin suit, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank v. CrowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Burke v. BurkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Williams v. VailMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Deyoe v. JamisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Ryan v. AkeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paxton v. DeardonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Siebolt v. Konatz Saddlery Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Holloway v. Burroughs & Taylor Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Whitney v. HydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Clute v. EverhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.