Wright v. Hake
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Grand Rapids. Injunction to restrain suit on replevin bond. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The bill of complaint in this cause was filed by Charles W. Wright, Charles H. Southwick, William G. Gustine, Darwin P. Cody and Charles E. Oiney against William Hake and William T. Merritt, setting forth the following state of facts:
That on the 24th day of November, 1874, the defendant Hake had-in his possession certain personal property, which was taken from him by a writ of replevin at the suit of defendant Merritt; that the complainants became sureties for Merritt in the replevin suit; that Hake defended the suit, and the same was tried April 2, *5271875, and verdict rendered therein for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Viele v. HoagSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
- Hershler v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Western Wooden-ware Ass'n v. StarkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Lothrop v. SouthworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Williams v. VailMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mack v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Koontz v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Hansel v. PurnellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Krause v. LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- J. L. Hudson Co. v. BarnettMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.