Henry v. Quackenbush
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. Replevin. Defendants bring error. Judgment set aside.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This is an action on a replevin bond, and has been twice tried. Quackenbush was plaintiff in the replevin suit, and Henry set up a special property under an execution against one Parmlee. Quackenbush failed in his replevin suit, and as the property had been delivered to him, Henry waived return, and took judgment for the amount of his lien. He then brought suit on the replevin bond against Quackenbush and Peter and Charles Ferguson, who were his sureties. This is the second trial of that suit.
On the first trial the Fergusons undertook to show that Henry had never made any valid levy of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Western Railway Co. v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Quackenbush v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Williams v. VailMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Ryan v. AkeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitchell v. Reolds Farms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Connor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- People ex rel. Fletcher v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Morley v. University of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934