Legal Opinion

Kundahl v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 6, 1971No. 418-1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

An action was brought in the superior court of King County by Paul C. Kundahl and Billie Kundahl, his wife, for damages for an encroachment upon their land; in which action Leo S. Fischer and Viola K. Fischer, his wife, were joined as additional defendants. The Fischers in turn joined Frank H. Elrod and Marie B. Elrod, his wife, as parties defendant, settled with the plaintiffs, and the case was then tried to the court without a jury on the Fischers’ cross complaint which alleged that the encroachment was caused by a faulty survey made by Frank H. Elrod some 5 years before. The trial resulted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Frohs v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Moonie v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Mattingly v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Lindquist v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. The Gates Rubber Company, a Corporation v. Usm Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API