Legal Opinion

Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1975No. 43662PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, ,J.

Louis Gazija, a commercial fisherman, sought to recover damages for loss of nets and other fishing gear from the Jerns Company, his insurance agent, for its alleged tortious cancellation of an insurance policy covering this gear. A judgment based on a jury verdict was entered in favor of respondent Gazija and affirmed by the Court of Appeals. We granted review solely on the issue of whether respondent’s action was barred by the statute of limitations.

Gazija began fishing in 1954 and obtained an “inland marine floater” policy from petitioner, providing insurance coverage for his gear…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API