Legal Opinion

Frohs v. Greene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1969PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is a negligence action for claimed malpractice by defendants doctors and hospital. Plaintiff appealed from a judgment dismissing her action after the trial court had sustained demurrers to her fourth amended complaint. The demurrers were based upon the statute of limitations. ①

Plaintiff filed her complaint on May 10, 1967, alleging that in 1951 defendants negligently gave her injections of penicillin when they knew or should have known that plaintiff was allergic to penicillin. She also alleged that defendants were negligent in failing to take certain treatment to counter the injections.

P…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Wilkinson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Morgan v. Grace Hospital, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hundley v. MartinezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API