Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Dight

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1969No. 39714PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

There is a saying that what one does not know does not hurt him, but, when it comes to surgical operations, this old bromide has turned out to be no more than half a truth. Nature has a mysterious way at times of hiding mishaps in surgery, and cases are legion where foreign-objects such as sponges, scalpels, forceps and hemostats have been inadvertently left in a surgical wound and the patient remained oblivious of it for years afterward. Although on discovery of the oversight the surgeon can later provide a medical remedy, the statute of limitations as construed by this court usually blocks…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lee Quinton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Wilson v. El-DaiefSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lipsey v. Michael Reese HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API