Legal Opinion

Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'Hern

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1992No. 57966-1PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The State of Washington (State) petitioned for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, which reversed a dismissal on summary judgment in the State's favor by the Pierce County Superior Court. We granted review. The State contends that respondents are not aggrieved by the trial court's order and that they therefore had no standing to appeal to the Court of Appeals. It further contends that the statute of limitations has run on plaintiff's original complaint and that the "discovery rule" does not apply to extend the applicable 3-year statute of limitations. We reverse the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API