United States v. Findlay
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Pursuant to his pleas the appellant was convicted by a special court-martial with officer members of larceny of stereo equipment valued at $541.00. His adjudged and approved sentence was a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months and forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for three months.
Inter alia, the appellant asserts that the military judge erred by denying the defense counsel’s challenge for cause of four court-martial members. The record shows that during voir dire examination by the defense counsel he asked LTC “N” if he thought a guilty plea…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. KarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. CosgroveUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. DavenportU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. DawdyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. AutreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. WilliamsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.