Legal Opinion

United States v. Autrey

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 9, 1981No. CM 440638PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKAY, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of two specifications of violation of a lawful general regulation by soliciting and accepting money from trainees under his control. He was sentenced to be reduced to the grade of Private E — 1 and to be discharged from the service with a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence but suspended the execution of the discharge for a period of six months.

The appellant assigns three errors:

I

THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY DENYING THE APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS ON…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. In Re Petition for Removal of RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  4. United States v. FindlayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HaydenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. LaneU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. AldridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. FrageU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API