United States v. Autrey
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McKAY, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of two specifications of violation of a lawful general regulation by soliciting and accepting money from trainees under his control. He was sentenced to be reduced to the grade of Private E — 1 and to be discharged from the service with a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence but suspended the execution of the discharge for a period of six months.
The appellant assigns three errors:
I
THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY DENYING THE APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS ON…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- In Re Petition for Removal of RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- United States v. FindlayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HaydenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. LaneU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. AldridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. FrageU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988