Legal Opinion

United States v. Dawdy

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 27, 1983No. ACM S26060PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Important signals for military judges and trial and defense counsel arise in this case. Here, the accused claims that the military judge erred in denying a defense challenge for cause against Lieutenant Colonel Delaney, the court president.1 On the particular facts, we disagree; however, we pause to sound a note of caution in this general area.

At trial, the precise defense challenge against Colonel Delaney centered on three areas: (a) his neutrality as a juror; (b) his disposition on sentencing; and (c) his views as to the weight to be accorded testimony of Office…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. Blas Chavez, Jr. v. United States of America, Nonie Tenorio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. MoyarU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. HawksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. DaleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. CarfangU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. AbdelkaderU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API