United States v. Williams
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HERMAN, Judge:
We are concerned, in this case, with a defense challenge for cause of a member of the court, and with the objectivity of the general court-martial convening authority who took action. We find that the military judge properly denied the challenge in that the member did not harbor an “inelastic” attitude toward a sentence of punitive discharge, and that the convening authority was not disqualified from taking action on the case because of an anti-drug abuse program he initiated in his command.
In accordance with his pleas, the accused was convicted by general court-martial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- In Re YamashitaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- The Committee for Gi Rights v. Honorable Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. DavenportU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. HugginsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. HeriotUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983