Legal Opinion

Roberts v. City of Ottawa

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1917No. 21,256PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff sued for the death of her husband, caused by the caving in of a lateral sewer, in which he was at work. The plaintiff recovered and the defendant appeals.

Some point is sought to be made touching the failure of the deceased to use certain safeguards, but the only material question concerns the applicability of the workmen’s compensation act to the defendant city in this case. A lateral sewer to be paid for entirely by property owners, and in no part by the city at large, was to' be built, and the work was let to certain men, who…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Bowden v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Hibbard v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Butler v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Fisher v. Delaware TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Chamberlain v. Bowersock Mills & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Leslie v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API