Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is a workmen’s eompensation case in which claimant was allowed compensation for total permanent disability. Respondent has appealed. The legal questions presented are: (1) Whether the accident for which compensation was allowed arose out of the employment; and (2) if it did, the extent of plaintiff’s injury and the amount of compensation due him.
The facts are not seriously controverted and may be stated as follows: Respondent produces oil from leases and operates under the workmen’s compensation act as a self-insurer. It had an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Haas v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Palmer v. FinckeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Scott County School Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Bailey v. Mosby Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.