Legal Opinion

Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1934No. 31,853PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a workmen’s eompensation case in which claimant was allowed compensation for total permanent disability. Respondent has appealed. The legal questions presented are: (1) Whether the accident for which compensation was allowed arose out of the employment; and (2) if it did, the extent of plaintiff’s injury and the amount of compensation due him.

The facts are not seriously controverted and may be stated as follows: Respondent produces oil from leases and operates under the workmen’s compensation act as a self-insurer. It had an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Haas v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Palmer v. FinckeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Scott County School Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Bailey v. Mosby Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API