Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Bowersock Mills & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1939No. 34,537PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was an action under the workmen’s compensation act. The compensation commissioner found for the .plaintiff. On appeal the district court found in part for the claimant and in paro *935for the respondent. The case is here on appeal by the respondent and cross-appeal by the claimant.

Chamberlain, the claimant, was employed by the Bowersock Mills and Power Company, a corporation located at Lawrence, and. went to work on Thursday, June 2, 1938. On June 3, while he and other employees were moving some machinery, ha suffered an injury tó the third…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Atlantic & Pacific Rld. v. ReisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Morris v. Garden City Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Palmer v. FinckeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Cornell v. Cities Service Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Jackson v. Stevens Well ServiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Bailey v. Mosby Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Flock v. J. C. Palumbo Fruit Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Stanley v. United Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API