Legal Opinion

Hibbard v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1916No. 20,052PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for an injury sustained by being bitten by a coyote in the defendant’s park. The plaintiff recovered judgment. The defendant appeals.

The defendant maintained a public park in which were located a number of buildings, where wild animals were kept. Three coyotes were there confined in a cage constructed of heavy wire of two-inch mesh, built on a cement foundation, about two feet from the ground. Mrs. Hibbard, mother of the plaintiff, drove to the park with a neighbor, and upon her arrival…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Peters v. City of LindsborgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Bowden v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. La Clef v. City of ConcordiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. City of Caldwell v. PrunelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Grantham v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Warren v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API