Hibbard v. City of Wichita
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for an injury sustained by being bitten by a coyote in the defendant’s park. The plaintiff recovered judgment. The defendant appeals.
The defendant maintained a public park in which were located a number of buildings, where wild animals were kept. Three coyotes were there confined in a cage constructed of heavy wire of two-inch mesh, built on a cement foundation, about two feet from the ground. Mrs. Hibbard, mother of the plaintiff, drove to the park with a neighbor, and upon her arrival…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Peters v. City of LindsborgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Bowden v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- La Clef v. City of ConcordiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- City of Caldwell v. PrunelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Grantham v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Warren v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.