Legal Opinion

Leslie v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1956No. 40,138, 40,139PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

These appeals arise out of proceedings under the Workmen s Compensation Act. Roth respondent employer and his insurance carrier have appealed from judgments allowing recovery to each claimant. Since each appeal involves the same question, they were ordered consolidated in this court.

The record discloses without dispute that respondent Eugene C. Reynolds is the owner of an 850-acre beef and dairy ranch located near Fall River, Kansas; that the claimants, Milton O. Leslie and Hazel Marie Leslie, are husband and wife; that claimant Hazel Marie…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Ellis v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Sundgren v. Topeka Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. Hilyard v. Lohmann-Johnson Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Osborn v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Centex Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Hite v. Evart Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Durnil v. GrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Babcock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Johnson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API